Welcome to CCP's Blog --- Where IT Solutions Are Born!

Why Link Building is so Important for Ranking

Friday, 31 July 2009 04:07 by Libby

Link Building is critical to Google placement.  Here's a great refresher article from ClickZ, Mike Grehan on the science of link building.

Why Linking is Important to Ranking.

Libby Lucas
www.ccpteam.com

llucas@ccpteam.com
704-549-0125

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Subdomains vs. Subdirectories for Blogs

Friday, 24 July 2009 08:20 by Libby

SEO debate continues on the subject of how you create an SEO friendly blog URL.  If I research this question, I can find ten "experts" that prefer subdomains and 10 more that have good reasons to use subdirectories.  Matt Cutts of Google recommends subdirectories so I think it states the obvious to say subdirectories have it!  Here's your example of both and an article on the subject from Matt.

Subdomain:  blog.ccpteam.com

Subdirectory:  ccpteam.com/blog/

Subdomain vs. Subdirectory for Blogs Article by Matt Cutts.

Happy Blogging!

Libby

www.ccpteam.com

llucas@ccpteam.com

704-549-0125

 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Are Paid Directories Valuable to Google Ranking?

Tuesday, 21 July 2009 05:25 by Libby

 

Matt Cutts of Google explains the value of paid directory links.

llucas@ccpteam.com

www.ccpteam.com

 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Building Directory Links: A wicked link building scheme?

Saturday, 18 July 2009 11:28 by Libby
It is still the current practice to use directory link building as a way to achieve high search engine ranking but at what cost? This wicked link building scheme produces directory overload for everyone!   

Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin anchored their algorithm on the theory that worthy websites receive more back links (or votes).  Google still constructs their algorithm based on this very academic point of view.  The theory is based on the idea that if a topic is worthwhile, someone publishes information about it, another person references that published paper (or links back to the paper) therefore making the case that the publisher must be the best in that field of study.  Right?   

Wrong!  Sometimes there’s just not much to say about janitorial services, sheet rock, or industrial lighting.  It is a sound theory in the world of the academicians but does not always translate well to business.  If you could think of something else to publish about the subject of sheet rock, and other blogs or webs linked back to your compelling article would that make you the best sheet rock company in the Southeast?  Who knows, but the odds are slim.  The system is flawed at best. 

The fact remains though as internet marketers we must create links back to our sites to achieve ranking.  To create these links we must write excessive amounts of unnecessary content and link our clients’ sites to every directory on the internet.  This in turn promotes the unnecessary directories and mucks up the search engine results for end users.  It’s a vicious cycle and the end result is directory overload!   

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Google Eye Tracking Study

Thursday, 4 June 2009 03:14 by Libby

Google performs eye scanning test to observe how searchers are examining a page. 

The common visual pattern is this “F-pattern”  (see diagram).  Also known as the “Google Golden Triangle”.

Google research also shows that web visitors fall into two main groups.  People that are searching only for information, or "Informational Searchers"  and "Transactional Searchers" people that are scanning for a specific site or additional web links to their desired product or service.  There are significant differences in their tracking.  This next illustration shows a Transactional Search query.

Transactional Search Query

This illustration shows an Informational Search Query

The huge difference points to many different conclusion of which there are hundreds of reports on but there is one common conclusion that all can agree on;  If you want to reach a broad audience and achieve the maximum ROI you must be in the top three!

For more information on this subject try searching "google eye tracking study" on seobook.com or blogstorm.com.

Libby Lucas
www.ccpteam.com

llucas@ccpteam.com

704-549-0125

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Google Adds New Menu! SEO is changing again!!!!

Wednesday, 13 May 2009 16:07 by Libby

Google Inc. Tuesday said it would add a new menu to its search-results page to help users refine results by a broader range of variables. It also announced an online service that compiles search results into a spreadsheet.

The services represent the search giant's latest crack at coming up with new ways to make search results more useful to consumers. The new refinement feature will let users filter their results by a number of factors, including how new the information is. A search for a celebrity would show recent news about the person, as opposed to their official Web site, for instance. Until now, Google users saw a general view that ranked results based on Google's algorithms.

The search options menu also lets users see their results in different visual formats, such as a graphic called the Wonder Wheel that shows topics related to a query as different spokes. For a search for "President Obama," the feature shows spokes like "Michelle Obama" and "Barack Obama news."

 Read more

 Libby Lucas
llucas@ccpteam.com

www.ccpteam.com

 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Price Ranges of SEO Advice and PPC Advice

Thursday, 7 May 2009 04:33 by Libby

I have been researching the price ranges for SEO.  To date I have received information on page optimization and PPC campaigns that range from $71 per month to $5,000 per month.  Amazingly many of the offerings are comprised of the same elements.  Buyers beware!  Research SEO before you buy.  If you want free SEO advice CCP offers a downloadable PDF.  Just give us a shout. 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Follow the Google Guidelines to Get to the Top of Google

Tuesday, 5 May 2009 02:30 by Libby

Google makes it very easy for small businesses to climb up in the organic searches on a local basis.  If you follow the guidelines that they provide on the Google Analytics website you are doing better than 50% of your competitors.  I have listed the guidelines below to assist you but you may go directly to these by following this link:  http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=70897&topic=19494

 

nWhen your site is ready:
nSubmit it to Google at http://www.google.com/addurl.html.
nSubmit a Sitemap using Google Webmaster Tools. Google uses your Sitemap to learn about the structure of your site and to increase our coverage of your webpages.
nMake sure all the sites that should know about your pages are aware your site is online.
nDesign and content guidelinesback to top
nMake a site with a clear hierarchy and text links. Every page should be reachable from at least one static text link.
nOffer a site map to your users with links that point to the important parts of your site. If the site map is larger than 100 or so links, you may want to break the site map into separate pages.
nCreate a useful, information-rich site, and write pages that clearly and accurately describe your content.
nThink about the words users would type to find your pages, and make sure that your site actually includes those words within it.
nTry to use text instead of images to display important names, content, or links. The Google crawler doesn't recognize text contained in images.
nMake sure that your <title> elements and alt attributes are descriptive and accurate.
nCheck for broken links and correct HTML.
nIf you decide to use dynamic pages (i.e., the URL contains a "?" character), be aware that not every search engine spider crawls dynamic pages as well as static pages. It helps to keep the parameters short and the number of them few.
nKeep the links on a given page to a reasonable number (fewer than 100).
nTechnical guidelinesback to top
nUse a text browser such as Lynx to examine your site, because most search engine spiders see your site much as Lynx would. If fancy features such as JavaScript, cookies, session IDs, frames, DHTML, or Flash keep you from seeing all of your site in a text browser, then search engine spiders may have trouble crawling your site.
nAllow search bots to crawl your sites without session IDs or arguments that track their path through the site. These techniques are useful for tracking individual user behavior, but the access pattern of bots is entirely different. Using these techniques may result in incomplete indexing of your site, as bots may not be able to eliminate URLs that look different but actually point to the same page.
nMake sure your web server supports the If-Modified-Since HTTP header. This feature allows your web server to tell Google whether your content has changed since we last crawled your site. Supporting this feature saves you bandwidth and overhead.
nMake use of the robots.txt file on your web server. This file tells crawlers which directories can or cannot be crawled. Make sure it's current for your site so that you don't accidentally block the Googlebot crawler. Visit http://www.robotstxt.org/faq.html to learn how to instruct robots when they visit your site. You can test your robots.txt file to make sure you're using it correctly with the robots.txt analysis tool available in Google Webmaster Tools.
nIf your company buys a content management system, make sure that the system can export your content so that search engine spiders can crawl your site.
nUse robots.txt to prevent crawling of search results pages or other auto-generated pages that don't add much value for users coming from search engines.
nTest your site to make sure that it appears correctly in different browsers.
nQuality guidelinesback to topThese quality guidelines cover the most common forms of deceptive or manipulative behavior, but Google may respond negatively to other misleading practices not listed here (e.g. tricking users by registering misspellings of well-known websites). It's not safe to assume that just because a specific deceptive technique isn't included on this page, Google approves of it. Webmasters who spend their energies upholding the spirit of the basic principles will provide a much better user experience and subsequently enjoy better ranking than those who spend their time looking for loopholes they can exploit.
nIf you believe that another site is abusing Google's quality guidelines, please report that site at https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/spamreport. Google prefers developing scalable and automated solutions to problems, so we attempt to minimize hand-to-hand spam fighting. The spam reports we receive are used to create scalable algorithms that recognize and block future spam attempts.
nQuality guidelines - basic principles
nMake pages primarily for users, not for search engines. Don't deceive your users or present different content to search engines than you display to users, which is commonly referred to as "cloaking."
nAvoid tricks intended to improve search engine rankings. A good rule of thumb is whether you'd feel comfortable explaining what you've done to a website that competes with you. Another useful test is to ask, "Does this help my users? Would I do this if search engines didn't exist?"
nDon't participate in link schemes designed to increase your site's ranking or PageRank. In particular, avoid links to web spammers or "bad neighborhoods" on the web, as your own ranking may be affected adversely by those links.
nDon't use unauthorized computer programs to submit pages, check rankings, etc. Such programs consume computing resources and violate our Terms of Service. Google does not recommend the use of products such as WebPosition Gold™ that send automatic or programmatic queries to Google.
nQuality guidelines - specific guidelines
nDon't create multiple pages, subdomains, or domains with substantially duplicate content.
nDon't create pages with malicious behavior, such as phishing or installing viruses, trojans, or other badware.
nAvoid "doorway" pages created just for search engines, or other "cookie cutter" approaches such as affiliate programs with little or no original content.
nIf your site participates in an affiliate program, make sure that your site adds value. Provide unique and relevant content that gives users a reason to visit your site first.
nIf you determine that your site doesn't meet these guidelines, you can modify your site so that it does and then submit your site for reconsideration.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Yodle, Reach Local, Yellow Page Scams | Don't Buy the Snake Oil!

Tuesday, 3 March 2009 15:34 by Libby

If it sounds to good to be true, then it probably is! 

There are many companies including the Yellow Pages, Reach Local and Yodle that are out their selling "first page results".  They promise to get your website listed on the first page of the search results for popular keyword terms.  The misleading part of that claim is that they are not getting your site to the middle or "organic" part of the first page, they are paying to place your site in the sponsored link areas at the top and right hand side. 

So what's wrong with that?  Nothing if you understand what you are buying and want to pay a premium for someone else to buy your Pay-Per-Click advertising.  For example, let's say you are selling Hot Sauce.  You could pay the Reach Local guys to buy PPC for about $1,000 month  OR .... You could open up a Google Adwords Account for $5 and set a budget of $10 per day and buy your own words for $300 or less per month.

Still fuzzy on the technical parts --- no worries --- call my office and I will be happy to go over it with you.  704-549-0125

www.webdesigncharlotte.org

 

 

Currently rated 3.0 by 2 people

  • Currently 3/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Networks
Managed Services
IP Phone Systems
Web Design

Bookmark and Share